Search the Institute

Compare systems, not labels.

Technology labels are poor substitutes for comparable evidence. GCCEI compares complete thermal systems rather than idealised reactor chemistry.

Common feedstock

The same or materially equivalent feedstock must be used where technology performance is compared. Clean dry plastic cannot fairly represent one technology while wet mixed municipal waste represents another.

Common boundaries

Comparison should align equipment, facility, waste/resource, product-use and lifecycle boundaries and identify the counterfactual.

Operating conditions

Scale, throughput, temperature, residence time, preprocessing, operating hours, startup, shutdown and upset conditions can change performance.

Pollution control

Combustion control, filtration, acid-gas treatment, gas capture, wastewater and residue systems belong inside the technology boundary.

Products and residues

Useful output, contamination, upgrading, actual end use, displacement and final fate must be considered alongside residual streams.

Compliance and consequence

Regulatory compliance is important evidence. It does not necessarily answer every environmental or public-health question, just as detection of a hazardous emission does not by itself demonstrate population harm.

The useful question is: which complete system performs better for this material, place, operating condition and realistic alternative?

Current Insights

Comparative Thermal Treatment

Pyrolysis and Incineration: What Can Actually Be Compared?

Pyrolysis and incineration are different thermal-treatment families, but meaningful comparison requires far more than contrasting their reactor chemistry. Feedstock, energy, pollution control, products, residues and displaced systems must all be examined on equivalent boundaries.

All Insights

This website adds no optional analytics or advertising cookies. Essential hosting technologies are managed by the hosting service.

Read the cookie information